The Career Evolution of the Sex Gap in Wages: Discrimination vs. Human Capital Investment was written by David Neumark and Giannina Vaccaro for the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
Abstract
Several studies find that there is little sex gap in wages at labor market entry, and that the sex gap in wages emerges (and grows) with time in the labor market. This evidence is consistent with (i) there is little or no sex discrimination in wages at labor market entry, and (ii) the emergence of the sex gap in wages with time in the labor market reflects differences between men and women in human capital investment (and other decisions), with women investing less early in their careers. Indeed, some economists explicitly interpret the evidence this way. We show that this interpretation ignores two fundamental implications of the human capital model, and that differences in investment can complicate the interpretation of both the starting sex gap in wages (or absence of a gap), and the differences in “returns” to experience. We then estimate stylized structural models of human capital investment and wage growth to identify the effects of discrimination and differences in human capital investment, and find evidence more consistent with discrimination reducing women’s wages at labor market entry.
Read – The Career Evolution of the Sex Gap in Wages: Discrimination vs. Human Capital Investment
- Find the paper on the NBER website here.
- Find the paper on the SSRN website here.
